SMN Twitter





    Showing posts with label Spider-Man. Show all posts
    Showing posts with label Spider-Man. Show all posts

    Thursday, January 15, 2015

    Sony Pictures Teases 'Sinister Six' Is Still Happening?


    Okay, this Spider-Man news has gone on long enough. It's been a giant back and fourth on rumors and speculation that Spider-Man is staying at Sony. No he is going back to Marvel Studios for future Avengers movies. Then no he will be co-owned by both companies. Well just after yesterday's rumor by Latino-Review that Spider-Man has indeed returned to Marvel....Sony Pictures Brazil has posted a Sinister Six teaser image that reads in Portuguese “We Have Plans For You…. #SpiderMan”  

    Now while it seems that Spider-Man may be staying at Sony Pictures it could be entirely possible that Marvel/Sony have come to a deal that would allow a Sinister Six movie to still progress as scheduled before him appearing in Avengers: Infinity War.Of course that is pure speculation based on a fans dream that The Avengers and Spider-Man will appear on screen together...

    Stay tuned as this story progresses....

    Sinister Six is expected to debut in late 2016

    Wednesday, January 14, 2015

    Massive Spoilers Leak On What Happens To Captain America, Thor and Iron Man Before 'Infinity War'


    Today in Dave of Latino-Review's spoiler filled column he revealed that the deal between Marvel Studios and Sony Pictures seems to have gone through to allow Spider-Man to appear in Avengers: Infinity War Part I. He also goes onto reveal some massive spoilers on what is to become of Marvel's big three Captain America, Thor and Iron Man before the massive intergalactic battle with Thanos.

    :: Massive Spoilers Ahead ::

    According to their sources towards the end of Captain America: Civil War it seems Steve Rogers will indeed be killed off as seen in the climax of the Civil War comic story arc "Death of Captain America". It will be at the hands of Crossbones () and will be during the feud between Rogers and Tony Stark after Stark finds out it was Bucky who killed his planets as confirmed in Captain America: The Winter Solider. They go onto claim somehow Iron Man will end up in space but is extremely vague on this. Remember Tony Stark does join the Guardians of the Galaxy in the comics so this might be how the Guardians warn The Avengers about Thanos since remember...they have no idea he even exists yet. Lastly, in Thor: Ragnarok many Asgardians will die and this will lead to Thor (Chris Hemsworth) being sent to a "Galactic Prison" of sorts. Is this him finally being sent to Valhalla? And just like that the top three Marvel characters will be out of Avengers: Infinity War Part I.

    Who will then defend earth from Thanos? Apparently the "New" Avengers may end up being lead by Doctor Strange (Benedict Cumberbatch) himself along with Black Panther (Chadwick Boseman). Others on the team include Scarlet Witch & Quicksilver (Elizabeth Olsen & Aaron Taylor-Johnson), Ant-Man (Paul Rudd), The Wasp (Evangeline Lilly), Daredevil (Charlie Cox), Luke Cage (Mike Colter) Jessica Jones (Krysten Ritter) and Iron Fist (TBA). New additions also include Captain Marvel (TBA) and Spider-Man (TBA) will also play a large part as well. Lastly, they add the any of the Guardians of the Galaxy and Inhumans could also play a part in the battle. Let's just hope Agent Coulson (Clark Gregg) gets to shine in the films once again without being forced to add any of the other characters from Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D into the movies.

    None of the original Avengers from the first two phases will have a part in Infinity War Part I because they will return for Infinity War Part II.This will be Marvel's first test to see if these new characters can lead the company into future Phases without the main Avengers appearing.

    Avengers: Infinity War Part I hits in 2018

    Spider-Man Seems To Be Back At Marvel Studios For 'Avengers: Infinity War'!


    It's January 2015 and you Spider-Man fans know what that means. Ever since the infamous Sony Hack in late November many secrets from the company was revealed to the world. Unfortunately it came with a price for the employees of the company but that isn't what we are here to talk about. The good news for film fans was the revelation that Marvel and Sony had been talking for a while to have Spider-Man crossover into the Marvel Cinematic Universe starting in Captain America: Civil War. This was before the hack and the two company's couldn't come to an agreement...then the hack happened which left Sony losing millions of dollars per day and without a play against Marvel.This lead to Sony calling for a "Spidey Summit" to take place this month to figure out what to do with their most profitable character Spider-Man. Will they forge forward with their cinematic universe and forget Marvel all together or will they cave and co-own the character alongside Marvel Studios guidance?


    Now today the day of reckoning has come according to Dave of Latino-Review the deal has been finalized. Spider-Man is set to appear in The Avengers: Infinity War Part I & II in 2018 & 2019. Unfortunately for you Andrew Garfield fans he will not be returning to the project. Marvel Studios will use a brand new young actor for the role of Peter Parker. If the rumors are also true the character will be back in High School but won't focus to much on the love stories like the past two franchises did.


    The fan favorite top picks for a new Peter Parker include Perks of Being a Wallflower star Logan Lerman or Maze Runner star Dylan O'brien amongst others. This of course needs to be kept into prospective until Marvel and Sony jointly announce Spider-Man is actually back....

    Saturday, January 3, 2015

    Sony Pictures Could Start Shooting 'The Amazing Spider-Man 3' in March


    While the fate of web-slinger known as Spider-Man still remains unclear since the Sony Hack some new information has debuted regarding Sony's original plan with the character. A casting call for The Amazing Spider-Man 3 went out from Bill Beckman Casting about the film.
    Studio: Columbia Pictures (Sony)
    Project Name:The Amazing Spider-man 3
    Starring: Andrew Garfield, Dane DeHaan
    Description:Peter Parker/Spider-Man faces a new challenge to protect New York City.
    Casting for: Extras, male/female, 18-65, all races/ethnicities
    Project type: Feature Film
    Shooting Location: Atlanta, GA
    Payrate: $148/day, up to $900/day for speaking/special talent parts
    Union: SAG voucher eligible
    Now while on the main site we couldn't find an exact date when this casting call went out a similar casting call was posted on that websites Facebook which indicate that the film could start filming as early as March 2015 in Atlanta, GA.

    This also shows that the casting call was in November which was right before the infamous Sony Hack. Which revealed that Sony may end up selling the rights back to Marvel Studios after the "Spidey Summit" later this month. Of course it is still entirely possible that Sony decline to team-up with Marvel and forge ahead with their current plans in The Amazing Spider-Man 3 and Sinister Six films. Sony could also push back the shooting for The Amazing Spider-Man 3 but keep the location in Atlanta, GA.

    Thursday, December 18, 2014

    Marvel Studios Wants 'Spider-Man' For 'Avengers: Infinity War'; Solo Film in 2019?


    Over the last several weeks we have gotten word through the infamous Sony Hack that Sony and Marvel came close to a deal that would allow Spider-Man to finally crossover into the Marvel Cinematic Universe and appear in Captain America: Civil War. Well of course talks broke down and the "shipped sailed" on that idea with Black Panther (Chadwick Boseman) assuming that lead role. Well Marvel and Sony are still apparently in discussions to have Spider-Man appear in the MCU eventually and Marvel has just the movie for him. According to Val Broeksmit (via Comic Book Movie) who dug through more Sony emails found that Andrew Gumpert the President of Worldwide Business and Operations for Columbia Pictures (Subsidiary of Sony Pictures) told Sony Pictures chairman Amy Pascal if the deal goes through with Marvel. Marvel Studios wouldn't want the next Marvel/Sony Spider-Man film to be a continuation of Civil War but be a teenage superhero who lives in the aftermath. That there will be two sides for all superheros. In the purposed Civil War cameo it would have Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr) giving Peter Parker the infamous Iron Spider suit seen in the Civil War comic. He would also meet Black Widow (Scarlett Johannson) as well as Captain America (Chris Evans) himself.

    He also goes onto mention that Marvel wants to have a solo flick out by 2019 with Spider-Man having a semi-major role in The Avengers: Infinity War Part's I & II in 2018 and 2019 specifically. In a way this is a lot like how The CW introduced Flash into the Arrow-verse. First letting him appear on Arrow as a "back door pilot" before debuting in his own show a year later. This is how Marvel seems to be treating their introduction to Peter Parker. First appearing in Civil War and Infinity War before getting his own film a year later.

    All will be known come January when Marvel and Sony hold a meeting regarding this Spider-Man deal. It may actually come to pass with Sony Pictures losing tens of millions of dollars per day since the initial hack as well as an extra $75 Million after cancelling all plans to release The Interview starring Seth Rogen and James Franco.

    Sunday, December 14, 2014

    Sony & Marvel 'Spider-Man' Meeting Held in January; Kevin Feige Wants Avi Arad Out


    Almost everything we heard regarding Spider-Man showing up in the Marvel Cinematic Universe has been a bunch of "what of, could of" situations. Given that word is that talks broke down in late October early November about the character showing up in Captain America: Civil War. We also got word that Sony Pictures is planning on holding a "Spidey Summit" in January to figure out what they even want to do with the character from here on out. There have been talks of Spider-Man going back to Marvel or an adult Spider-Man reboot with Andrew Garfield allegedly fired.

    Well now a scoop coming from Screen Gonzo claims to have some more details on this Spidey Summit. It will indeed include Marvel Studios head Kevin Feige as well as Sony head Amy Pascal at Pinewood Studios. Apparently if the deal goes through Marvel is seriously considering on using their famous post-credit stingers to fully set up Spider-Man for Avengers: Infinity War.  But who will be directing Avengers: Infinity War? That would be Anthony and Joe Russo. The Russo Brothers already revealed to Sony head Amy Pascal that they would like to produce a Spider-Man film. But if Marvel regains the rights they are Marvel's top pick to write and direct the new trilogy of Spider-Man films after Avengers: Infinity War. The stinger could be in Avengers: Age of Ultron with pick-ups starting soon but most likely Captain America: Civil War.

    Lastly, Kevin Feige has made it clear he wants longtime Spider-Man producer and former boss Avi Arad out of the new Marvel Spider-Man films. Ask any movie going nerd what the problem with the Spider-Man films are and they will all point to Avi Arad.

    All these concerns were brought up in Amy Pascals leaked memo to herself regarding Avi Arad, The Russos and creative control. It will all finally be answered in January with some type of an announcement as early as February but definitely before Avengers: Age of Ultron hits in May. But keep in mind it's entirely possible Sony rejects everything and moves forward with their own Spider-Verse plans.

    'Mud' Director Jeff Nichols To Helm 'Aquaman' For Warner Brothers?


    The Sony Hack gifts keep coming. Recently we have seen leaked emails from not just Sony but involving superhero films from other studios as well. Like The Russo Brothers taking over directing duties on The Avengers films at Marvel. As well as Simon Kinberg confirming he is doing an X-Men/Fantastic Four crossover...well now it's Warner Brothers turn. In an email on October 21st Columbia Pictures co-president Micheal De Luca reveals to Sony head Amy Pascal that Mud director Jeff Nichols is apparently being looked at to helm Aquaman for Warner Brothers starring Jason Momoa as the King of the Seven Seas (via The Daily Beast

    The co-President goes onto reveal that 22 Jump Street & The Lego Movie directors Phil Lord & Chris Miller will direct The Amazing Spider-Man 3 if Sony doesn't make the deal with Marvel come January and reboot the character again.

    Aquaman is scheduled to hit July 27th, 2018

    Saturday, December 13, 2014

    Sony Considering Adult 'Spider-Man' Reboot Starring Ryan Gosling If They Keep The Rights?


    Everyday a new piece of information leaks from the Sony Hack regarding not just James Bond and Ghostbusters but their crown jewel Spider-Man. Most of it was between Marvel and Sony considering bringing a young teenage Spider-Man into Captain America; Civil War which had talks break down in early November. Now while it's still a very real possibility Sony also has a contingency plan in case they reject Marvel's deal come January at the Spidey Summit. Sony's plan is to once again reboot the entire character but not go do the origin but have him as an adult. This idea comes from Jeff Robinov to Sony head Amy Pascal (via The Daily Beast) on the option of keeping Spider-Man and making him an adult:
    "In the next Spider-Man movies, we can’t go back to his origin story. Think of the 25 films in the James Bond franchise; just because a new creative team comes aboard, and breathes new life into a classic property, doesn’t mean the origin story has to be retold.To argue that there’s plenty of other superhero movies with levity in the marketplace, so why make more Spider-Man movies, would be akin to saying there’s no room for James Bond films because of all the espionage films and franchises that have come out over the years. There will always be room for this beloved, iconic hero."
    He goes onto mention the story would involve Kraven the Hunter and an adult Spider-Man:
    I might suggest looking at what is widely thought to be the most beloved Spider-Man storyline of all time – “Kraven’s Last Hunt” – which ran across Amazing Spider-Man #293-294, Spectacular Spider-Man #131-132, and Web of Spider-Man #31-32. (In fact, Comic Book Resources polled their readers in 2012, and this storyline was voted as the single greatest Spider-Man storyline of all time.)

    In it, Kraven the Hunter tracks down Spider-Man, shoots him repeatedly, and leaves him for dead, buried underground. He then dons a Spider-Man costume and savagely starts attacking criminals.

    What makes this story resonate with fans is that it proves it takes more than just the costume to become “Spider-Man.” No matter what he’s wearing, or what predicament he’s facing, Peter Parker is sensitive, passionate, and connected to those he’s interacting with in a very powerful way. It’s not Peter’s powers that make him special – Kraven, and every other superhuman in the Marvel Universe, all have powers. Peter is special because of his values, because of what drives him, because of the lessons he’s learned from Uncle Ben’s death, and because of his love for Mary Jane. I’ve pasted a few pivotal pages from this book so you can see just how intense this storyline is.

    We also get to see how Mary Jane deals with Peter’s disappearance, and how she would react if Peter ever died in action.
    Another side of Spider-Man that might be interesting to explore in a reboot is seeing him as an adult. Spidey hasn’t remained a teenager over the 52 years he’s been around. He’s moved in with his girlfriend, gotten married, and in some storylines, even became a science teacher at a high school.

    It might feel fresh to see Peter Parker juggling with adult issues. He’s done so in the comics for decades, and kids still found this fun to read.
     He then goes onto list a "wish list" of directors he would like see tackle this Spider-Man movie exclusively for Sony:

    • Brad Bird
    • Edgar Wright
    • David Yates
    • Damien Chazelle
    • Glenn Ficarra & John Requa
    • Phil Lord & Chris Miller
    • Colin Trevorrow
    • James Gunn
    • Chris Buck & Jennifer Lee
    • Joe Cornish
    • Don Hall & Chris Williams
    • Joachim Rønning & Espen Sandberg 

    This comes off the recent emails which have essentially fired star Andrew Garfield from the series after his comments about the company getting to involved with The Amazing Spider-Man 2. But who could possibly play an adult web-slinger? Well in a separate email The Daily Beast uncovered Amy Pascal reveals that star Ryan Gosling is very eager in being in a Sony pictures movie for Pascal after turning down Doctor Strange at Marvel and Suicide Squad for DC. She goes onto specifically mention Sinister Six as a possible start for the actor but didn't mention in what role...maybe Spider-Man Who is rumored to team up with the Sinister Six to take down Venom.

    Friday, December 12, 2014

    Sony's Amy Pascal Memo About How a Marvel/Sony 'Spider-Man' Deal Could Work


    This unfortunate Sony hack seems to be the gift that keeps on giving. Mashable seems to have also gotten some leaked Sony emails between Sony Pictures head Amy Pascal and producer Matt Tolmach questioning how Spider-Man could have fit into Captain America: Civil War:
    "I love introducing PP [Peter Parker] in Cap but I know it comes with so many things since we won't give them what they want what will we give them? We can say it's a cameo but I'll bet it's more and will involve some of his world and it will be peter and spidey right,"
    This of course is referring to Marvel wanting creative control of one of their most beloved and profitable characters since his introduction in the comics.  Amy Pascal also goes onto write a memo to herself on some logistical issues and questions she would need to ask Marvel Studios and Sony for this to work:
    "If we have Spider-Man in Cap 3 [Civil War], What is our fee and our back end? [We would] need script approval, casting approval of Spider-Man and Aunt May and consultation of Mays house in Queens [New York] and any other Spiderman locations we may need in future movies. Also approval of new Spider-Man costume.  How long is he is the movie? How closely does it follow the Civil War story line? Does the world find out who Spider-Man is? Are there any other characters from the Spider-Man universe they are using? Can we use one of the Marvel characters in our future Spider-Man movies not produced by Marvel? Can we use Captain America to set up Sinister Six? Can Drew [Goddard] work with The Russo Brothers to get this done? Are we renting him out?"
     She goes onto to ask other question regarding a new director and current producers Avi Arad and Matt Tolmach:
    Would we have to dismantle Sinister Six?Can Drew Goddard write the Spider-Man original? Who would direct the Spider-Man movie? What do we do with Matt Tolmach and Avi Arad? They can not put Spidey in future Spider-Man movies or team ups. We need to keep animation rights for a theatrical release Spider-man movie to be directed by Lord and Miller. We need to be able to make Spider-Man movies after this movie we need to be able to make the girl team up movie. Is it possible to put Spidey in worlds without other characters once he is with Iron Man and Captain America? Can we have him in Cap 3 and then 6 months later in Sinister Six? We get to make future movies with our characters and theirs in a collaborative way but we dont need their approval.Marvel produces a bunch of Spider-Man movies for Sony the way they do for Disney....all spiderman dominant movie are financed and marketed by us even though Disney will have the merch on everything. We can put the Marvel and even Disney logo on ours if we can put Sony on theirs.
    The site also goes onto reveal that back several months ago before talks even began with Marvel Sony became quite displeased with their star Andrew Garfield after his comments that the producers and company sort of ruined The Amazing Spider-Man 2. He also apparently stood of Sony CEO Kaz Hirai at a fundraiser which allegedly got himself fired from future Spider-Man movies:
    "His absence (with less than an hour of notice) was seen as an affront and slight by the company's Tokyo bosses,"
     Then that's when we had heard The Amazing Spider-Man 3 was being pushed back to 2018 and a soft-reboot with a new actor may happen with The Sinister Six. All because of his comments about the company. Then it seemed that's when Sony and Marvel began talks about once again rebooting the character in the Marvel Cinematic Universe since it seemed Garfield was out of the picture anyway. 

    Stay tuned as this story develops....remember Sony could always accept a deal with Marvel come January during the Spidey Summit.

    The Russo Brothers Will Direct 'Avengers: Infinity War'; Wants to Produce 'Spider-Man'


    The leaked emails between Marvel and Sony keep getting better or worse depending on which side of the argument you are on. Overtice Brazil has unearthed emails between Captain America: The Winter Solider directors Anthony and Joe Russo to Sony head Amy Pascal in which they also asked for Spider-Man to appear in their next film Captain America: The Winter Soldier. Of course the talks broke down over creative control until recently. Then on November The Russo's Brothers revealed that they would be taking over directing duties from Joss Whedon in Avengers: Infinity War Parts 1 and 2. But they reassure her their production company Bullitt will still help produce the Sony film The Gray Man.

    They then go onto ask if they could produce the Spider-Man films (Unknown if this is for Marvel/Sony or just Sony) through their production company. And mention that it would be a difficult talk to basically kick current producers Avi Arad and Matt Tolmach out but one she should consider. Amy Pascal never got back to them on that offer but a week later their systems were hacked so it's possible she never had the time during the chaos. Lastly, the site goes onto mention how producer Avi Arad has begged Pascal to greenlight the Venom spin-off as well as Motion Picture Group head Jeff Robinov warning her not to make a deal with Marvel over Spider-Man's rights...

    It has yet to be announced that the Russo's will direct the next installment of the Avenger series from Joss Whedon but let's at least hope Whedon stays on as a writer....

    No Andrew Garfield or Origin Story if Marvel Regains 'Spider-Man' Rights


    Several days ago a massive Sony hack occurred that leaked a multitude of personal data, files, emails and salary earnings from Sony Entertainment. One of the emails was between Sony and Disney on the extremely small possibility in using Spider-Man in Captain America: Civil War. Which for nerds this is the holy grail of news since Spider-Man hasn't been with Marvel since the 1990's. Unfortunately talks broke down on "creative control" of the character and Marvel moved forward with their Black Panther (Chadwick Boseman) version of the Civil War story in place of Spider-Man.

    Now it seems Sony Japan the main corporation is furious with Sony Pictures and their handling of their multimillion dollar tentpole in the Spider-Man franchise. They are keeping this supposed deal with Marvel on the table until January to hold a "Spidey Summit" that will figure out what to even do with the character. One is keep on making spin-offs like The Sinister Six and Venom films like previously announced. Another would be make a deal with Marvel in a 60/40 split that would indeed give Marvel creative control of the character but Sony keeps distribution with financing coming from Disney.

    Latino-Review has since posted some tidbits on Marvel's contingency plan if they indeed retain partial rights of the characters alongside Sony. First off Andrew Garfield who is by far the best Peter Parker we have seen  on screen will indeed be out. It's unfortunate but no surprise given Marvel wants a fresh start with the character. Spider-Man will not have a role in Captain America: Civil War because the script is already completed with Black Panther taking up the "Spider-Man" role that we saw in the comics. That doesn't mean a Peter Parker cameo can't happen but don't expect anything major. Lastly, Marvel wants to focus on the idea of a teenage superhero again but NOT Spider-Man's origin story. He will have already by the time of their Spider-Man film have already been the web slinger for a while. It's because over the course of 5 films (Webb's and Raimi's) a love story has been the focus of the films. This time it will be more on the difficulties of leading a double life as a teenager and superhero with a love story as a side-plot.

    Again, this is just a contingency plan for Marvel if they regain rights to the character...

    Wednesday, December 10, 2014

    Marvel Studios and Sony 'Spider-Man' Negotiations Still On The Table


    Last night an email leaked at the hands of a hacking group known as the #GOP that revealed some new information of Sony Pictures Spider-Man franchise. Apparently towards the end of October Sony and Disney were discussing a possibility that would allow Spider-Man to appear in Captain America: Civil War but Sony would keep creative control in a new MCU trilogy of the character. So obviously it sounded like talks broke down given that Marvel obviously would like creative control in their Marvel universe and not the other way around.

    Well, now Latino-Review has gotten a little bit more information on this back and forth negotiations between the two company's. Apparently Sony Japan is furious at this email leak scandal and the leadership over at their subsidiary Sony Pictures. That they are actually going to keep Marvel negotiations on the table and may force Sony Pictures to make a deal with Marvel so they can get financing and distribution but Marvel gets creative control. A 60/40 split of the web slinger. Sony Japan are the ones who flip the bill when it comes to the salary's of the Sony executives:
    "Sony Japan thinks the Marvel deal for Spider-Man is still on the table and they want to renegotiate as a return to quality, the 60/40 split is can be negotiated and Sony Entertainment’s October hard-line stance of wanting creative control is now mostly moot in the eyes of the higher-ups."
     It's entirely possible this renegotiation can happen as early as next month when Sony holds a "Spidey Summit" to figure out what they will do with their character and the spin-odds that hang in the balance.This would explain why we have heard next to nothing on the next film in the franchise Sinister Six because Sony may actually be holding off to figure everything else out. It's also entirely possible Marvel may take Sinister Six director Drew Goddard (Who worked on Daredevil for Marvel) and bring him on to direct the new Spider-Man films set within the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Unfortunately, it's unlikely Marvel would bring star Andrew Garfield back in the new trilogy even though everyone agrees he is the best Peter Parker we have seen on screen.

    If Marvel does by some miracle get Spider-Man back don't expect to see him before Avengers: Infinity War. At least nothing more than a cool cameo...Lest we forget a couple months ago Badass Digest got word that Sinister Six may actually be a soft reboot of the character teaming up with the Sinister Six like The Dirty Dozen but with a new actor. Marvel could take this concept for their Spider-Man instead of once again doing his origin story.

    Stay tuned as this story develops....

    Tuesday, December 9, 2014

    Sony Almost Allowed 'Spider-Man' To Be in 'Captain America: Civil War'


    For the past couple weeks a slew of importation has leaked from the departments over at Sony Pictures from a a group of hackers called #GOP. Some of the documents included the leak of several Sony films including Fury and Annie. As well as salary and earning readings for top Sony executives. Of course many nerds joked "Wouldn't it be great if they hacked the Spider-Man rights back over to Marvel" well something like that actually kinda happened!

    The Wall Street Journal got emails between Sony's motion picture chief Amy Pascal and Disney CEO Bob Iger about Spider-Man and the current Marvel cinematic universe. The emails were dated on October 30th had the two discussing a way to have Spider-Man show up in Captain America: Civil War then have his own trilogy with Sony and Marvel sharing the rights:"Sony Pictures president Doug Belgrad tells Ms. Pascal about a potential scenario that would see Marvel produce a new trilogy of Spider-Man movies while Sony retains 'creative control, marketing and distribution." Unfortunately for you true believers talks once again broke down between the two company's and Marvel has made Black Panther (Chadwick Boseman) the "Spider-Man" of the upcoming Civil War storyline. This would be the second time talks broke down between the two company's about Spider-Man. The first being OSCORP Tower was almost in The Avengers skyline back in 2012.

    However a "Spidey Summit" will now be held in January to determine what Sony will do with the character after the set back that was The Amazing Spider-Man 2. This summit will include the villain team-up The Sinister Six as well as the female spidey universe film long rumored to be Black Cat.

    Tuesday, October 7, 2014

    RUMOR: Sony Once Again Considering Teaming Up 'Spider-Man' With 'The Avengers'?


    It seems every time we get to this 6 month stretch of promotion before an Avengers movie a slew of Spider-Man rumors begin popping up from the Sony camp. If some of you don't know currently Marvel Studios does not hold the live-action feature film rights to use our favorite web-slinger n their cinematic universe because Sony owns him. And vice-verses none of the Avengers are allowed to appear in a Spider-Man film.

    Well back in 2012 when the first Avengers film and first Amazing Spider-Man reboot films were both debuting Sony approached Marvel Studios to try to digitally add OSCORP Tower into the New York skyline alongside Stark Tower. It never came to pass because it was simply to late in the post-production stage for Marvel to add a new tower into the film but the discussion did indeed take place confirmed by Amazing Spider-Man producer Avi Arad.

    Now fast forward to 2013 and the second Amazing Spider-Man film debuted. Now while it was a commercial success as is every Spider-Man film it was panned by critics and fans alike. After this happened Sony moved up their Spider-Man villain movie Sinister Six and pushed back Amazing Spider-Man to presumable 2018 but that is unconfirmed.

    Well, it seems Sony may be reaching out to Marvel Studios once again for help to bring their web-slinger into the limelight...allegedly. According to HitFix Sony and Marvel are discussing some way to incorporate Spider-Man into The Avengers universe!
    While I can't get the confirmations I need to verify the story, I'm hearing that there are some very cool "Spider-Man" plans being discussed that would help Sony refocus their enormously important franchise while also opening up some connections in the onscreen Marvel movie universe that would blow fandom's minds. Will it work out? I don't know. I would love to be able to state for sure that it's happening. What seems clear from what I've heard is that Marvel wants to be able to play with all of their characters, and if they can make that work creatively and on a corporate level, they will, and that means the world gets bigger again.
    Now while every nerd once again prays to the comic-book gods that Spider-Man shows up alongside Iron Man and The Hulk it really just makes no sense this far into each universe. We are about 10 films into the Marvel Cinematic Universe and two films in the Spider-Man cinematic universe with zero mention of either one. Where was Spider-Man during the Battle of New York? Was he not Spider-Man yet? Ok fine. But where was The Avengers when The Lizard/Electro tried taking over New York. It just seems like a massive headache trying to figure this out to fit each one. This isn't DC where we have multiple earths and can time-jump between them (A way to connected DC TV with DC Films but that's for another article). It just seems impossible, but if Marvel and Sony announced tomorrow that we would be getting Spider-Man in The Avengers 3. I'll be one of million other nerds to be crying from pure happiness; it just seems highly unlikely. 

    The Avenger 3 & The Amazing Spider-Man 3 are expected to hit in 2018

    Tuesday, August 5, 2014

    EDITORIAL: Why Not to Hate AMAZING SPIDER-MAN 2


    Over the past few months, since the film’s release, I have heard a lot about Amazing Spider-Man 2. I have heard a lot of good things from the general audience, kids, teenagers, and adults alike, but from the comic book community I've heard about 75% bad & just plain nasty (and unnecessary) comments about the film, and quite honestly I’m getting sick of it. So seeing as how there’s all this new news about the franchise (Sinister Six, Venom, and an unknown female character all getting their own spin-off films before Amazing Spider-Man 3 in 2018) and the film coming out on Blu-Ray/DVD in two weeks, I thought that I would write up an article explaining my frustrations with these “haters” and expressing my love for the film and this new franchise.

    The comments I've read and continue to see around the internet about Amazing Spider-Man 2go like this:

    “That film is complete and utter shit!”

    “That movie has crappy dialogue and I didn't care about any of the characters or subplots!

    “I hated the first one so I didn't even bother seeing the second one because it’s complete shit like I said it would be.”

    These comments go on and on and on and they're all the same.

    To be completely honest, I LOVE The Amazing Spider-Man 2! In fact, I'm almost to the point where I truly believe that it is the BEST Spider-Man film out there, including Sam Raimi's beloved Spider-Man 2. As someone whose favorite superhero consists of three superheroes, them being Batman, Superman, and Spider-Man, I’m slightly biased and will defend each of these heroes until the day that I die. However, I don’t defend works like Superman III, Batman & Robin, and/or Spider-Man 3; therefore I truly do believe that Amazing Spider-Man 2 is being mistreated.

    As I continue on with this little tangent I want to go through each aspect of the film that people have problems with, including costume, characters, music/score, subplots, and so on. These are the parts of the film that I truly enjoy and want to defend as I see not only a lot of mindless/thoughtless hate for them, but just plain disrespect.


    The Costume: Believe it or not I have heard complaints about the suit from Amazing Spider-Man 2… I honestly don’t even know how to respond to these people who make these complaints; I mean really it’s the most ridiculous thing you could complain about with this movie. Spider-Man’s suit in The Amazing Spider-Man I can understand people complaining about (to an extent), and people did! And Sony/Marvel heard you, so they decided to give Spider-Man a suit that looked… Wait for it… EXACTLY like the comic book version of the suit!!! (Minus the logo, but that’s to be expected with it being the new franchise logo and all). Spidey's costume in this film leaps directly out of the pages of the original Stan Lee/Steve Ditko Amazing Spider-Man comics as well as the Brian Michael Bendis’ Ultimate Spider-Man books! I mean, I don’t understand why the hate! During the Raimi trilogy, people complained that the eyes were silver and not white, during the first in the Marc Webb franchise people complained that his eyes were yellow/gold and not big enough. Now, with the eyes being white and large, people still complain about this suit!!! I mean seriously? Comic book movies are called “adaptions” for a reason… The Dark Knight, The Avengers, Man of Steel, Iron Man, Guardians of the Galaxy, X-Men: Days of Future Past, and even Watchmen aren't all EXACTLY “comics accurate” (some are really close, and others are further away)! So why is Spider-Man expected to be 100% comics accurate as well?


    The Characters: This is also one I truly don’t understand… What’s wrong with the characters exactly? Aunt May is just like the version we see in the Ultimate Universe. She’s some-what tech-savvy, she’s modern, she’s a bit younger, and she keeps secrets like every other woman her age on the planet. She’s like any other adoptive mother who just wants her child to love her for who she is and what she’s done for him/her and not to worry about their birth parents. I mean how is that bad characterization when that’s how people in our world today are? Speaking of, what’s wrong with characters like Peter Parker or Gwen Stacey? I've heard the argument that Peter is “too cool”, but you see that he has problems talking to girls, he’s a nerd, he’s bullied at school (by Flash Thompson, as seen in the first film), he loses the girl of his dreams because of guilt and is still in love with her, and I could go on. Although this version of Peter tries to make it look like everything’s okay by looking “cool”, you can see that he has some serious issues! I mean, his girlfriend dies because his best friend kills her! None of this is bad characterization; this is just Peter Parker’s life! This is how Stan Lee originally created the character, to have terrible luck, to have ups and downs, to be awkward around girls and other people, to be a normal human being! Andrew Garfield plays this perfectly and shows every human side of Peter Parker, and then shows the larger-than-life side of Spider-Man, funny quips and all!

    Now with Gwen, I can’t imagine anyone having a problem with her in this film because she was perfect. From her writing to her portrayal by Emma Stone, she was just brilliant in this film. The chemistry between Peter and Gwen in this film is incredible! “That’s just because Garfield and Stone are dating in real life.” Yes, but no. It’s because they’re both brilliant actors. Stone is that way with everyone she’s on screen with in other films as well. As for Garfield, his chemistry with Stone is rivaled by his chemistry with Sally Field’s Aunt May, who he shares just as heartfelt scenes with. Not to mention the scenes between Peter and Harry, between Spider-Man and Electro, and between Spider-Man and the kid at the end of the film. I mean, Garfield just knows how to play the stage! Now, as for all the dialogue that people complain about, here's the thing, that's how teens/young adults talk nowadays! We make jokes all the time, we are awkward when talking to girls or other people we don't know, we can be sappy romantics and we can be unaware of our surroundings. Yes, Peter is at the extreme end of that spectrum, I know I'm not like that all the time, but he's definitely representing the modern generation through the way he talks, as is Harry and Gwen. Gwen when she gives her Valedictorian speech where she's the voice of reason and Harry on his pursuit to live longer and not miss anything. This film is almost, quite honestly, a social commentary on the side!


    Now, I can admit that the character of Max Dillon was a bit strange, but almost all of Spider-Man’s villains in the comics are just about that sick in the head. I mean, has there been one villain in ANY Spider-Man film yet who hasn't talked to themselves in a way that would make Gollum cringe? The answer is “no”. And I can also admit that Harry jumping from not getting Spider-Man’s blood to being the Green Goblin was also a bit of a stretch, but you also have to realize how psychotic the Osborn family is, both in film, animation, and comics! Harry was in a desperate situation and if you ask yourself the question, “how far would you go to save your life?” I guarantee that there wouldn't be an answer, because most people would do anything. Harry just had the resources to do more than most would, and in-so-doing that made himself insane to the point where he went after Spider-Man, and on some level won.

    On the subject of Harry, I've heard a lot of complaints from people saying that Peter and Harry becoming friends again after around a decade of not seeing each other is a stretch and too “unbelievable”… Well first of all you’re watching a movie about a guy who got bit by a spider which gave him superpowers, but okay… Secondly, I had a friend back in 6th grade that I was best friends with, but about halfway through 7th grade we split because I got together with a girl and he got new friends. It was stupid, but hey that’s middle school. We went to the same high school and said “hi” whenever we saw each other, but it wasn't until second semester senior year (about 6 years later) where we were on the same school trip to Israel (which was amazing by the way), and then we hit it off again and are now, once again, best friends. I mean, yes, it’s somewhat a stretch for Peter and Harry to be friends again after that much time, but if we’re to believe that they were good friends as kids, and from what is explained in the film they were, then it’s really not that big of a stretch for them to hit it off again after all that time. My Mom still hits it off with people she went to high school with when she hasn't seen them in twenty years, this is just how some people work!

    None of the characters in this film are done injustice, even Rhino is set up from the beginning and comes full-circle as a villain by the end, though some are definitely sidelined for others, but that’s honestly okay. That’s movies for you!


    The Music/Score: I have heard many complaints about the score to this film, not as much about the actual music used, but certainly about the score. Let me start this section off by saying that I believe Amazing Spider-Man 2 has one of the best movie soundtracks I've heard. From the score music on the track to the songs used, including “It’s On Again” by Alicia Keys, I cannot get enough. Originally when I saw Amazing Spider-Man 2 I walked out of the theater with my only complaint being the score. I had said to my good friend Dan Schmidt (of Across the Airwaves Productions) that I thought they did a great job with the dubstep part of the score mashing with Electro, but I didn't think they had a strong enough Spidey theme like James Horner's from the first film. Well, after a second viewing of the movie in the theaters and then buying the deluxe edition soundtrack to the film, I have changed my mind. In early June I drove out here to Montana from Chicago with my friend Jonathan (I was moving from Chicago to Montana where I’m going to be going to college in a few weeks), and on the whole two day drive from there to here we listened to the Amazing Spider-Man 2 soundtrack on repeat and fell in love with it. If you play one track from the soundtrack now I can tell you which track it is and when it plays in the film. The use of music in the film is also outstanding! From “Song for Zula” during Peter and Gwen’s not-date before Electro attacks to “Gone Gone Gone” by Phillip Phillips when Peter is putting his wall together before he realizes he needs Gwen… I mean, really, the use of these songs (and others, especially during the end credits) was great! I’m just mad that “Gone Gone Gone”, now one of my favorites, is the one song from the film that I really, really liked that isn't on the soundtrack!

    But onto the score complaints from the audience… 

    “Hans Zimmer… What the [REDACTED] happened?” 

    Well, I’ll tell you what happened; Hans Zimmer didn't do this score on his own (which I believe is a good thing)! His scores for The Dark Knight(with James Newton Howard) and Man of Steel were brilliant and fit their characters/story perfectly, his score here, where he’s joined by the creative talents of the Magnificent Six, Pharrell Williams, and Johnny Marr, is just as good and fits the characters in this film, as well as the story and tone, perfectly. 

    “I don’t like the score because it tries to tell me how to feel during the movie…” 

    Umm, excuse me, but isn't that what a score is supposed to do? The whole reason the score of a film, TV show, or video game is there is so that you feel something and so that you’re invested in what’s going on! Take horror movies for example, without the creepy piano music in the background, you wouldn't know the feel scared, or in The Dark Knight Rises when Bruce is climbing out of the pit and you have the epic score with the drums beating and the prisoners chanting, that’s supposed to make you feel empowered, larger than life, and it works! Amazing Spider-Man 2’s score did the exact same thing! It made you feel heroic when you heard the little Spidey tune (listen to the “I’m Spider-Man” and “I Need To Know” tracks on the score for a sample of that, then listen to the rest of the score as its heard throughout, “You’re That Spider-Guy” especially), it made you feel emotional whenever the Peter/Gwen theme came on (“I’m Moving to England”, “I Choose You”, “Let Her Go”, “We’re Best Friends”), and you felt a little fear whenever Electro or Goblin’s themes played (“I’m Electro”, “My Enemy”, “I’m Goblin”, “Sum Total”). I mean, that’s how scores work! Yes, the score for this movie was fairly “mainstream”, yes it was very “modern”, but Spider-Man is a character that, while he never changes, adapts to the culture surrounding him! I mean, he couldn't be stuck in the 60’s forever, and teenagers/young adults today (I would know) are much different than they were back in 2002! Spider-Man changes with the times, and thus so must his score.


    The Story: 

    “No one cares about Peter’s parents…”

    “The movie is just so convoluted, there’s too much going on.”

    “The ending sucked!”

    These are just a few of the complaints I've heard about the story and subplots in Amazing Spider-Man 2, and if you've read this far (first off I commend you, and thank you) please bear with me just a little longer, I promise I’m almost done. First of all, most of the questions you've been asking yourself since the first film are answered here in its sequel. It’s explained why Peter’s parents had to leave, it’s explained why Peter has powers because of the spiders and other people don’t, it’s explained why Norman Osborn is dying, and it’s explained why Doctor Connors cut off communication with Peter after Richard and Mary left! All of these answers are given to you, so I don’t want to hear about there still being a ton of un-answered questions, there’s not. Now, with my theory that Norman Osborn is still alive, there could be some questions there, but for the sake of this film he’s dead by the 45 minute mark (it might be later, but I honestly don’t remember, I’m watching it again next week when I get it on Blu-Ray).

    As for there being too much going on, how do you mean? The only story-line that seems somewhat out of place is Electro's to be honest, and there’s good reason for that. The reason I like that Electro's story in this film feels out of place is because it adds another layer of conflict and inconvenience to Peter Parker’s life. You see, the plot with him finding out about his parents, his relationship with Gwen, and being Spider-Man are all continuations of what we saw in The Amazing Spider-Man. Harry’s introduction in the film, as well as Norman’s supposed death, also fit into the context of this mythology and story because Oscorp and the Osborn’s are a part of that already-established story. Even Rhino’s introduction at the beginning (stealing from Oscorp, so there’s that connection as well) to his introduction as the Rhino at the end (also a part of the Oscorp story as we see the man from the end of the first film who talked with Connors) is a part of the Spider-Man story established in the first film with Captain Stacey’s “you’re going to make enemies” line. It’s ALL CONNECTED except for Electro! (Who is still slightly connected anyway).


    Electro is different; he’s special because he reminds us that the “little guy”, the “normal person”, is also affected by this crazy world that Oscorp has initiated onto New York City. Max Dillon is a nobody; someone who Spider-Man just saves along his way (again, part of the Spidey plotline started in the last film) and doesn't give another thought to. Someone who has a simple job at Oscorp; someone who no one really likes or pays any special attention to; someone who’s just lost in the fold of people that is New York City. And then, all of a sudden, his life changes forever because of an accident. All of a sudden, he FORCES himself into the story. He re-writes the script and forces himself to be a part of it. How many times has that happened in Spider-Man comics? The answer: constantly! Everything in this story was perfectly crafted by Alex Kurtzman and Robert Orci (Star Trek, Star Trek Into Darkness, Fringe, Sleepy Hollow, Watchmen, Transformers, Mission: Impossible III, etc.) and not only did service to us fans, but the comics and source material as well. As usual, they tied everything together and wrapped it up with a nice bow, while getting us pumped for their, eventual, upcoming third installment of the franchise (as well as Sinister Six, which is directly set up at the end of the film, and Venom).

    As for peoples problems with the ending, it took Peter seven months to move on from Gwen's death, that's ample time. As for why they didn't just leave it with Gwen's death?... It's because that's not who Spider-Man is. Although Spider-Man goes through a lot of crap and sees a lot of death in his life, he's still an optimist, he still brings people hope, and THAT'S what you see at the end of Amazing Spider-Man 2, you see Peter bringing hope back to New York as Spider-Man returns to save the day from Rhino. We didn't need to see the full fight, we know who's going to win, we just need to remember that Spider-Man is back and he's out there, despite all the foes that will stand in his way.


    The Mythology: This is my last point that is going to talk about the source material used in this film. Almost everything in this film is based somewhat on something from a version of Spider-Man in the comics, much like The Dark Knight Trilogy used “No Man’s Land”, “Knightfall”, “Year One”, “The Long Halloween” from the Batman comics or Man of Steel borrowed from “Birthright”, “Earth One”, “All-Star Superman”, “For Tomorrow”, and “Secret Origins”.

    Amazing Spider-Man 2 takes the Richard Parker being a “spy” and carrying around government secrets right out of the comics (“Spider-Man: Unmasked”). Though Richard is only framed by the men from Oscorp as a spy, he’s really a scientist just like his Ultimate Universe counterpart and, like in this film series, has a connection to Curt Connors and Norman Osborn (“Ultimate Spider-Man”). While Peter having a genetic marker in his blood that allows his spider abilities to work once he’s bitter by a genetically enhanced spider is an original concept (at least to my knowledge), it’s always been true in the comics that Peter has always been afraid to give his blood to others because he doesn't know what would happen to them. In fact, when his Aunt May lied dying in an older issue of Amazing Spider-Man, Peter almost didn't give her his radioactive blood because he thought it might kill her. As we see when Harry gets hold of the spider’s venom (which had not been mixed with the genetic marker that is Peter’s blood), we see that it has terrible effects which create the Green Goblin.

    We also see the relationship between Peter and Gwen develop as seen in the original Amazing Spider-Man comics’ first 121 issues as well as Jeph Loeb and Tim Sale’s “Spider-Man: Blue”, only to be taken apart by the Green Goblin (this time Harry Osborn, who has also been the Goblin in the comics, though not before Norman) Ala “The Night Gwen Stacey Died”. Though Norman Osborn is normally responsible for this act, and though it normally takes place on the bridge (which we see Peter and Gwen have a touching moment on before her death, another nod to the comics), we see that the writers changed the killer to Harry to make the death more personal, while still making it because of a Goblin (as well as a failed web-line…).


    We also see Electro as a lowly “worker-bee” (as is usually the case with him in all his comic interpretations) before he gets his powers, then after he gets his powers in a “freak accident” he becomes even more deranged, psychotic, and angry, much like his first appearance in Amazing Spider-Man #9 as well as in the Ultimate Universe. We also get to see Alistair Smythe as Electro's supervisor at Oscorp, and for you spider-fans out there you know that he’s the son of the creator of the original Spider Slayers and continues his father’s legacy, even becoming the Ultimate Spider Slayer himself.

    Then there’s the Sinister Six. The Gentleman we see at the end of Amazing Spider-Man, and then again at the end of Amazing Spider-Man 2, is named Gustav Fiers who is actually not from the comics, though he is a main character in Adam-Troy Castro’s Sinister Six novel trilogy that includes “Gathering of the Sinister Six”, “Secrets of the Sinister Six”, and “Revenge of the Sinister Six”, where Fiers not only assembles the Sinister Six together, but also is partially responsible for the death of Richard and Mary Parker, making the mythology of this franchise so much more interesting. We see in the credits that Green Goblin, Doctor Octopus, Rhino, Chameleon, Vulture, and Kraven the Hunter seem to be this incarnation of the Six (sad not to see Mysterio in live action, but maybe one day; Sandman’s already been done), which not only sets up the Sinister Six film, but also Amazing Spider-Man 3!

    Clearly as you can see, a lot of this film is inspired by the Spider-Man mythology that already exists, yet it twists it and crafts it to make it its own, while adding new things to the story to make the Amazing Spider-Man Cinematic Universe something to be excited about and cheer on. I know that’s what I’m doing, especially with Alex Kurtzman overseeing it (as well as the Universal Monster-Movie Universe)!

    _______________________________________________________________________________________________________
    There’s more of course that I could write about to show people why Amazing Spider-Man isn't just a great film, great superhero/comic book film, and a great Spider-Man film, but I’m getting tired and I have a feeling that if people aren't going to listen to what I've already stated loud-and-clear, they won’t listen at all, and that’s fine. At the end of the day, all that I care about is that I continue to enjoy and support this franchise, and I do; I hope you all feel the same way!

    Amazing Spider-Man 2 comes out on Blu-Ray/DVD on August 19, 2014.

    Friday, March 28, 2014

    Andrew Garfield On THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN 2: "Screw The Critics."


    With its release date coming ever so quickly, The Amazing Spider-Man 2 has easily become the must see movie of the summer. It is to no surprise that 2012's The Amazing Spider-Man was nowhere near as good as it really could have been, as both Marc Webb and Sony producers have said they should have done something a little more different. But alas, we have the much anticipated sequel, set to hit theatres everywhere on April 17th if you live in Australia and if you don't, sucked in. 


    Earlier this week IGN sat down with Andrew Garfield to discuss the film and how different it is to its' predecessor. Garfield touched on the original film's unoriginality by saying, "Obviously with the first film we were obligated to retreading the origin story, which Sam Raimi and Tobey Maguire did so beautifully," Garfield continued, "But now that's done, and now we get to own the character as filmmakers and as Peter, you know what I mean? I'm super excited, I mean it was much more fun to make because of that, I think." Following these thoughts Garfield interestingly said something that every Spider-Man fan has been saying ever since Garfield's first outing, "Screw the critics... I mean screw the scrutiny and that's the motto of life aswell. If there was one bit of advise I could give to my younger self, it's 'don't care what others think of you'." 



    Mr Garfield also touched on Harry Osborn (Dane DeHaan) and Peter Parker's friendship in the film. Garfield said, "The bond is really deep. It goes deeper than being childhood friends. There is this intertwined thing that they have after they both lost their parents," The Golden Globe nominated actor continued, "Their relationship is really built on abandonment and this lack of a father figure is what leads to them having compassion and understanding for each other. It's a complicated relationship, but it's a grounded one." 


    You can check out the full interview in the video below. Andrew Garfield and his on and off screen love, Emma Stone, will appear on The Graham Norton Show on April 11th on BBC 1.

    Thursday, March 20, 2014

    The Green Goblin Or David Bowie? New THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN 2 Image Released!

    Today, Sony released a 'final' trailer for next month's The Amazing Spider-Man 2. But that final trailer has not stopped the marketing at all for this film. Revealed via YouTube's SevenWebHeads, a new photo of Dane DeHaan as Harry Osborn/The Green Goblin has been released. Showing off the incomplete (?) costume and revealing a very devious smile. Now I have to say, am I the only one who thinks this Goblin has a striking resemblance to David Bowie? Come on, it's uncanny! Oh yeah, you know he looks like Bowie, even Marc Webb knows that, Dane DeHaan needs to play David Bowie. Get on it Hollywood.



    The latest film in the Spider-Man saga stars: Andrew Garfield, Emma Stone, Dane DeHaan, Jamie Foxx, Sally Field, Paul Giamatti and Colm Feore. The film is set for a April 17th release in Australia and New Zealand, while American's must wait until May 2nd. 




    Friday, March 7, 2014

    From Andrew Garfield to Peter Parker 'The Amazing Spider-Man 2' Featurette


    The Amazing Spider-Man 2 hits this May

    Thursday, March 6, 2014

    EDITORIAL: How 'Spider-Man' Can Legally Appear in the Marvel Cinematic Universe!


    That's right a loop hole has indeed been found in the contract between Sony and Marvel Studios. Now before I get into the specifics let me tell you the problem that ravages our favorite web-slinger appearing alongside Earth's Mightiest Heroes. 

    Back in the 90's before Marvel Films was the juggernaut it is now the company was going bankrupt and was selling off potential film rights to all their characters to other film studios. X-Men, Fantastic Four and others went to FOX. Blade over to New Line Cinema. Hulk and Namor over to Universal. And their prized possession Spider-Man over to Sony Pictures. Over the years some of their favorite characters they have reacquired from their contracts expiring ect ect. This includes Punisher, Blade, Ghost Rider and Daredevil!

    Now that Daredevil was acquired by Marvel Studios the company has moved forward to introduce him in his own series exclusively on Netflix. Alongside Jessica Jones, Luke Cage and Iron Fist. Why is this important well they are all considered "street level" heroes. They battle the mob and gangsters ect.

    Now one other "street level" hero is actually Spider-Man! Yes, Sony Pictures owns his film rights currently. The studio have a cinematic universe of their own being built around star Andrew Garfield. But how does this work with Marvel Studios?

    Back in 2009 the amazing Sony created show The Spectacular Spider-Man was brought to an end for Marvel's Ultimate Spider-Man to appear on Disney XD.


    IGN Reports:
    "Sony is NO LONGER involved with The Spectacular Spider-Man. I'm informed that Marvel can now produce the series, but of course, they don't have to." Weisman noted he had "no clue" as to what Sony gained regarding Spider-Man's film rights that they didn't already have that led them to give up the TV rights to the character.
    Many assumed that  this simply would mean that the animated rights of Spider-Man was relinquished over to Marvel Studios. But that is not the case...apparently it was ALL TV Rights. Last year Comic Book.com added how Sony doesn't own  any TV rights to Spider-Man:
    In some cases, studios apparently own the live action rights to a character, which would cover both movies and live action TV shows, but not animated cartoons. However, in the case of Spider-Man, Disney actually acquired the TV rights back from Sony.
    They hypothesized that he could appear on Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D given that was the only Marvel show in production that we knew of. Now that Marvel Studios is moving forward  with street level heroes on Netflix its actually possible to have Spider-Man appear on those shows!


    This does not mean that Andrew Garfield's Spider-Man will appear on the Netflix shows. If Marvel even uses the character it would most likely be a cameo as Peter Parker with a completely new actor as the web-slinger.

    Of course this doesn't mean Marvel will even attempt to enter those uncharted waters with Sony. So don't go assuming Spidey is gonna show up alongside The Defenders on Netflix even though it is possible. Also, this still means Spider-Man can not appear alongside The Avengers on film.

    Tuesday, February 25, 2014

    'Spider-Man Cinematic Universe' Films To Hit Every Year


    A couple months ago Sony Pictures announced that they will be drastically increasing the Spider-Man Cinematic Universe. Not just the current Amazing Spider-Man storyline but will be adding Venom and The Sinister Six to this cinematic universe.

    Now today Variety spoke with Sony Pictures co-chairman Amy Pascal about the Spider-Man franchise and she admits they want to release a Spidey universe film once a year:
    “We are expanding the ‘Spider-Man’ universe into ‘The Sinister Six’ and ‘Venom,’ so that we have ‘Spider-Man’ movies every year,”
    This is along the lines of what Disney is doing with Star Wars. Having the main Episode storyline every other year with spin-offs in between each Episode film.

    Last we heard was that Alex Kutzman (Star Trek, Fringe) is in line to write and direct Venom along with collaboration with Roberto Orci. While Daredevil showrunner Drew Goddard is in line to write The Sinister Six.These spin-off films have yet to have a release date though...

    Lastly, the report indicates that director Marc Webb will return for The Amazing Spider-Man 3

    The Amazing Spider-Man 2 hits this May